> Compare ChatGPT Sites with Revdoku for public AI website publishing versus protected client delivery, access gates, activity, and stable links.

# ChatGPT Sites vs Revdoku

ChatGPT Sites is a fast route from an AI-built result to a public website. Revdoku is a delivery layer for websites and files that may need passwords, verified visitors, activity records, and controlled updates.

## Quick comparison

| Feature | ChatGPT Sites | Revdoku |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Publish an AI-created public website | Deliver client websites and files |
| Public-link visibility | Public chatgpt.site pages may be discovered and indexed | Public, password, or verified-email access |
| Password gate | Public-site publishing is the main flow | Yes |
| Verified email and allowlists | Not the focus of public sites | Yes |
| Visitor activity and notifications | General publishing, not client tracking | Opens, pages, clicks, and downloads |
| Update delivery | Update the published site | Replace content behind one controlled URL |
| Best fit | Public experiments and landing pages | Proposals, reports, demos, and client portals |

The important distinction is access, not whether a URL looks obscure. A public subdomain can be crawled, copied, forwarded, and eventually shown in search.

[See the site:chatgpt.site Google results and audit your own sites](/blog/can-chatgpt-sites-show-up-in-google-what-site-chatgpt-site-r/).

## Which should you use?

Choose **ChatGPT Sites** for work you are comfortable publishing to the open web. Choose **Revdoku** when a client deliverable should be limited to people with a password or verified email.

Revdoku also records visitor activity, can notify you when a client opens the link, and lets you replace files or the website without changing the address you already sent.

[Try Revdoku for free](https://app.revdoku.com/).

---

[View the canonical page](https://revdoku.com/compare/chatgpt-sites/) · [Browse llms.txt](https://revdoku.com/llms.txt)